原帖由 hr1918 於 2009-12-24 20:45 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
試左執其中一張,唔好見怪:)不過始終jpg壓縮了, 肯定會差d, 方便執相都係影RAW會好d, 而且後期轉JPG都會好過就咁機身直出,不過玩得數碼機,基本執相少不了,點都要識少少著數d
至於鏡頭焦距, 55mmx1.6用來影所謂標準相 ...
Very sharp and well balanced colour. What lens did you use?
我個fd部7D係用黎打雀ge:lol
我係貪新鮮借黎玩玩je..xd
原帖由 FZ8084 於 2009-12-24 22:35 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Very sharp and well balanced colour. What lens did you use?
支鏡係Canon 70-200 F/4, 但其實影車同用咩鏡影,唔放大睇個分別都唔係咁大,顏色都可以PS執
不過今次我就無咩執,都係-EV RAW tro JPG only :)
原帖由 hr1918 於 2009-12-24 23:12 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
支鏡係Canon 70-200 F/4, 但其實影車同用咩鏡影,唔放大睇個分別都唔係咁大,顏色都可以PS執
不過今次我就無咩執,都係-EV RAW tro JPG only :)
I use Nikon 24-70 on a full-frame body, and the max. tele 70mm is barely tele enough.I have a 70-300G but the picture is not good at bigger apertures.
For colour, I set " Picture Control" to "Standard" but often find "Vivid /Strong" bring more solid colours and more "flavour" in RAW post-processing.
原帖由 FZ8084 於 2009-12-24 23:40 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
I use Nikon 24-70 on a full-frame body, and the max. tele 70mm is barely tele enough.I have a 70-300G but the picture is not good at bigger apertures.
For colour, I set " Picture Control" to "Sta ...
如果Nikon, 可以考慮下70-300 VR, 我用Nikon既朋友話都ok, 當然價錢都貴過70-300G啦:)
我都有諗過轉FF,不過我玩開,Canon, 而Canon d FF機實在....5D2畫質靚可惜其他spec太雞肋,1Ds系 又太貴,所以都係唔用FF住啦 ,如果5D2下一代有7D既spec就會考慮
Nikon 除左70-300VR，
貴少少ge 小黑3都唔錯ar，有大光圈，而且成象都幾好:)
原帖由 MM3119@102 於 2009-12-25 00:23 發表 http://hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
Nikon 除左70-300VR，
貴少少ge 小黑3都唔錯ar，有大光圈，而且成象都幾好:)
有大光圈都唔代表用果支鏡果陣係全開光圈架喎
收細一級光圈先真係叫好
之前借過支 55-200VR 呢支鏡黎影相
光圈收到 f8 黎影 , 真係幾 sharp 下
而家我用支 Tamron B003 都已經係全焦段既光圈都係用 f8 黎影
yes, I almost forgot 70-300 VR! high C/P value and still "compact".affordable.
小黑 gets the best of both worlds with large aperture. Good for birding/countryside but I still reserved of the size/weight, it is too intimidating for bus or urban photography. Very expensive when new.
Both lens are very good tele choices maybe I need to try on both to see which will be my next target;PI also fancy AF DC-Nikkor 135mm f/2D too.:$
[ 本帖最後由 FZ8084 於 2009-12-25 01:23 編輯 ]
原帖由 FZ8084 於 2009-12-25 00:57 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
yes, I almost forgot 70-300 VR! high C/P value and still "compact".affordable.
小黑 gets the best of both worlds with large aperture. Good for birding/countryside but I still reserved of the size/w ...
prime lens d quality係好好ar，
但我覺得用黎影車會5係咁方便，
因為有時d位置5係咁就得到...
原帖由 MM3119@102 於 2009-12-25 01:18 發表 http://www.hkitalk.net/HKiTalk2/images/common/back.gif
prime lens d quality係好好ar，
但我覺得用黎影車會5係咁方便，
因為有時d位置5係咁就得到...
I agree the quality has to be good for that price! Perfect for shooting aeroplanes, ships, sports etc. situation the objects are at far. For street photography the good glass lens has its limitations.