ben2004 發表於 2006-4-3 23:10

Product of Amplus .

http://ccdphoto.com/data/4/82/mK0TCRghjKu0gMFHStszReJVqzrqSIcr.jpg
http://ccdphoto.com/data/83/29/3jKwKbDZwA49j6WXPJUUkGGIKXfOH73D.jpg
http://ccdphoto.com/data/77/91/6FxzyEoC1rHwO0RNM7WYfSqBQtzp0yCO.jpg
http://ccdphoto.com/data/80/47/rPkMn2iSe57CKHw8kHMCz3uxxczo8jAw.jpg
http://ccdphoto.com/data/43/40/rEu5y3JHG3HPX1dYSqsVEGNPEf5Ke8eG.jpg
http://ccdphoto.com/data/96/4/n8YI1bu55BoDPHPnYkPRxaI6gCRe9lgl.jpg
http://ccdphoto.com/data/54/4/u1G2znHEhrGtkHw1KBThTiGXIRZHFs4j.jpg

全部電牌都係 Amplus 出 ?
影唔到成塊電牌係影車一大遺憾:)

lazyinhk 發表於 2006-4-3 23:14

最尾o個三張係lite vision

ben2004 發表於 2006-4-3 23:15

原帖由 lazyinhk 於 2006-4-3 23:14 發表
最尾o個三張係lite vision


噢 !
小弟一直以為佢地都係 Amplus
咁個原理又係咪一樣 ?
thx

kp3011 發表於 2006-4-5 01:59

原帖由 ben2004 於 2006-4-3 23:15 發表



噢 !
小弟一直以為佢地都係 Amplus
咁個原理又係咪一樣 ?
thx
They display the words using similar technology.
One simple way to differentiate between the two is that the background of Amplus is rather yellow, and it does not use the CTB standard font (ITCJ) . LV orange displays have a greyish black background, and can display ITCJ.

[ 本帖最後由 kp3011 於 2006-4-5 12:36 編輯 ]

ccicoltd 發表於 2006-4-5 09:33

原帖由 kp3011 於 2006-4-5 01:59 發表
One simple way to differentiate between the two is that the background of Amplus is rather yellow, and it does not use the CTB standard font (ITC ...
901 不也是用 Amplus 嗎？它的電牌可顯示 Johnston 字體。

kp3011 發表於 2006-4-5 12:35

原帖由 ccicoltd 於 2006-4-5 09:33 發表

901 不也是用 Amplus 嗎？它的電牌可顯示 Johnston 字體。
Ah, I only considered the 160x32 version :P

Thanks for reminding.
頁: [1]
查看完整版本: Product of Amplus .