[ref=406453]poonkh[/ref] 在 2005-10-29 12:27 PM 發表:
上似有個租車鋪老闆同我講話細心睇,新車用料,手工等係比舊車差~~
佢話... 個個買車都想要多 feature, 十幾萬車而家又合金鈴又加減波又天窗~~
所以唯有0係第0的0野度慳錢~~
仲有就係重量問題,而家d新車加埋加埋咁多野,
唔起d唔影響結構既地方偷薄下,分分鐘個重量
出黎會嚇親人也。 |
|
|
|
|
其實最離譜都未到日本車,講都未必有人信,係一個德國牌子既中型房車,
根據老友及親自睇過,舊款同新款相比係石頭同豆腐,舊款車比5.5噸撞
都只係摺少少,新款呢?成個尾泵把可以跌出黎,個行李箱蓋...唔駛講啦
至於比番私家車撞黎講,舊款比人隊尾,後面架車都可以Total Loss!
新款呢?兩敗俱傷 |
|
|
|
|
Let's take Volvo for example the newer volvo is easier to be damaged is because they want to protect the passenger's safety, compare a 760 with a S80, the difference is that the force of impact of a S80 to the passenger is alot less then the 760, yes, the 760 can have no external damage, but the occupant's can sustant measurable injury internally (My aunt's co-worker's got into an accident in a 760 GLE 10 years ago, and she still has back pain now) S 80 might get more damage in the front/ rear, but the passenger will sustain less injury internally.
[ref=407060]CZ_6686[/ref] 在 2005-10-30 12:42 AM 發表:
其實最離譜都未到日本車,講都未必有人信,係一個德國牌子既中型房車,
根據老友及親自睇過,舊款同新款相比係石頭同豆腐,舊款車比5.5噸撞
都只係摺少少,新款呢?成個尾泵把可以跌出黎,個行李箱蓋...唔駛講啦
至於比 ... |
|
Dat of Seattle
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|