[討論]甘泉航空

[ref=423413]norrislaw[/ref]  在 2005-11-17 22:50 發表:




我想billmf兄對呢方面最清楚
不過個人意見係, 甘泉背後既資金可以營運得到間公司有幾耐係一個問題
而且要維修6架744需要一定資金(又是還請billmf兄代答),甘泉真的afford得起嗎?

講真,我覺得甘泉未必afford得到,單係買個幾架二手744都用左唔少,二黎翻新機身外圍同埋引擎都用左唔少錢,所以我斷估甘泉應該唔會翻身機艙喇,除非甘泉有一定既capital喇,否則無可能......##

有個想法, 甘泉會否使用UA的灰加藍 (再貼上自己的名字)作為COLOUR SCHEME??
翻身機艙一定沒有可能, 大家可能要有心理準備甘泉可能好似泰東/ 天鷹既模式

[ref=408452]kychung[/ref]  在 2005-10-31 17:49 發表:
anyway
該公司ge出路極有可能就係成為"基督教指定航空公司"
每次都要全機人祈禱完先至起飛
到達時又要再"感謝恩典"至開艙門放人走

Hahaha this is a funny analogy - good one!

Back to the topic, lets not be too pessimistic, for a successful business, theres always going to be a starting point.

They are obviously trying to open up a new market trend, and taking on the risks involved. Personally, I would not mind travelling on a long distance low cost airline, as long as the airfare is cheap and provide me with a reliable and safe ride, that's all it matters. I can bring my own entertainment, MP3 players can keep me happy for more than 20 hours #8)

[ref=423568]billlmf[/ref]  在 2005-11-18 02:14 AM 發表:
講真,我覺得甘泉未必afford得到,單係買個幾架二手744都用左唔少,二黎翻新機身外圍同埋引擎都用左唔少錢,所以我斷估甘泉應該唔會翻身機艙喇,除非甘泉有一定既capital喇,否則無可能......##

搭單問：
當時國泰向新航購買存放沙漠既744，
前新航744由沙漠到達廈門後有幾多手尾要跟的？

[ref=408452]kychung[/ref]  在 2005-10-31 03:49 PM 發表:

響 low cost 長途呢個概念仲未被證明係咪受歡迎之前
一開始就用到744呢D咁大ge機種
我始終覺得係自信爆棚ge表現
(雖然買763ER又飛得唔夠遠 772ER又隨時仲貴過744)

該公司響網頁度聲稱要恪守聖經原則
不過又 ...

Long Haul Low Cost好似係當年People Express既慨念..

[ref=407169]KS[/ref]  在 2005-10-30 02:50 AM 發表:



佢唔係冇講,
係你自己睇得唔清楚姐!!!
網頁已經寫左係飛去 倫敦格域(Gatwick)機場 啦!!!

[ Last edited by KS on 2005-10-30 at 02:55 ]

Even I was wrong at the first place, there is no way to be rude to other people and using "!!!" after each sentence. I think you should beware of your manner when replying posts.

[ref=426221]norrislaw[/ref]  在 2005-11-21 01:55 AM 發表:



Even I was wrong at the first place, there is no way to be rude to other people and using "!!!" after each sentence. I think you should beware of your manner when replying posts.

首先,
我不嬲回文都經常用 "!!!" ,
都冇俾人話過
而今次我用 "!!!" 係因為覺得你o既回文有d奇怪,
既然你係個網頁睇倒 d 飛機會飛去 柏林、科隆 / 波恩,
點解會睇唔倒會飛去 倫敦格域 呢!
另外,
請問版規有冇寫明 "!!!" 係 rude 咁o既意思呢?
如果真係有,
我會收回我之前同埋今次所用o既 "!!!" ,
並向你作出道歉

既然版友 gakei 指站規應該係有寫不可以使用過多歎號,
可能我少上網啦, 唔知咩野叫網絡禮誼,
我現在正式向版友 norrislaw 道歉,
對唔住, sorry
並收回我之前同埋今次所用o既 "!!!"

[ Last edited by KS on 2005-11-21 at 17:56 ]

站規應該係有寫不可以使用過多歎號,
另外這也不符合一般網絡禮誼。

[ref=426396]KS[/ref]  在 2005-11-21 15:05 發表:
首先,
我不嬲回文都經常用 "!!!" ,
都冇俾人話過
而今次我用 "!!!" 係因為覺得你o既回文有d奇怪,
既然你係個網頁睇倒 d 飛機會飛去 柏林、科隆 / 波恩,
點解會睇唔倒會飛去 倫敦格域 ...

[ref=426396]KS[/ref]  在 2005-11-21 03:05 PM 發表:



首先,
我不嬲回文都經常用 "!!!" ,
都冇俾人話過
而今次我用 "!!!" 係因為覺得你o既回文有d奇怪,
既然你係個網頁睇倒 d 飛機會飛去 柏林、科隆 / 波恩,
點解會睇唔倒會飛去 倫敦格域 ...

I accept your apologie and lets move forward, shall we?

And thanks to Gakei to explain this for me.

[ref=423413]norrislaw[/ref]  在 2005-11-17 10:50 PM 發表:




我想billmf兄對呢方面最清楚
不過個人意見係, 甘泉背後既資金可以營運得到間公司有幾耐係一個問題
而且要維修6架744需要一定資金(又是還請billmf兄代答),甘泉真的afford得起嗎?

Well... I think Oasis HK do have enough funding to back them up to maintain few jets... Also they would only have 2 to begin operation with... And a while ago, I have read a article about Oasis HK and its founder and it is relatively strong backing too...