黃色土炮

九巴B7RLE用呢隻殼都幾好睇呀

But the area of electronic destination display is pretty so I guess this is one of the reasons that KMB did not consider to purchase this model.

捷聯d野唔係話好差
但佢係B6身上的前科,可能九記都引以為鑑
始終過境車...同市內巴士唔同.換車頻率都可能唔同.冇得計ge.
至少你用歐洲車身包你用足18年.
土砲跑過10年已好似B6咁就散.13年車rebody好定唔rebody好.

原帖由 cn2661_2d32 於 2010-3-14 22:07 發表
捷聯d野唔係話好差
但佢係B6身上的前科,可能九記都引以為鑑
始終過境車...同市內巴士唔同.換車頻率都可能唔同.冇得計ge.
至少你用歐洲車身包你用足18年.
土砲跑過10年已好似B6咁就散.13年車rebody好定唔rebody好. ...

Rebody之後俾非專仲好喇

原帖由 Derek2021 於 2010-3-14 21:25 發表
But the area of electronic destination display is pretty so I guess this is one of the reasons that KMB did not consider to purchase this model.

是陽光當年選錯牌size罷了....用珀運部LE5075果隻大牌,同呢隻細牌價錢一樣...

呢款捷聯車身其實都幾襟睇 ... 不過入面就唔知點啦

FOLLOW

原帖由 Derek2021 於 2010-3-14 21:25 發表
But the area of electronic destination display is pretty so I guess this is one of the reasons that KMB did not consider to purchase this model.

我相信果個位放大大塊amplus電牌都唔係問題,
土炮廠勝在customization.

不過九巴而加就傻仔啦,好買唔買走去買MCV,半年都仲未出得牌