俾人插到反眼既車

原帖由 S3N92 於 2009-8-8 10:42 發表

好似話加訂
小弟唔鐘意富豪...不過都期待緊批MCV B7

冇錯...好似係20架

講真,批車性能冇咩問題
最衰係冷氣出風口同車門...
後山高...而家好多新款單層車後山都高...
香港人只係未習慣

原帖由 sham 於 2009-8-8 10:45 發表
RE: 最近仲誇 , 連續3-4鑊有老人家落雨搭7M , 2C上樓梯跣親

, ]- P+ ^) L7 L
呢個情況其實都一早估到。就算係唔係落雨，有樓級都係危險。而家呢款車，低地台位置後已經黎幾樓梯，....

I have taken NV3927 @ 7M in late July
The performance is quite good
the bad points are listed in following
1. Although 3927 has runned for near 2 months, the smell is still too much

2. The stairs is quite high, I got a seat in the higher part of the bus
as I got off too quickly, I forgot that there was a stair, I nearly fell down
I  realized that the stair in ASB is much higher than those in ASB/ATS

總言之 , 九記今鋪搵人笨又搵自己笨.... K230 Original design係架12M長既full size單層 , 縮短去10.6M咪盞尾跨過長.....
好啦 , K230副偈係打直 , 車尾好難似Pointer個design斜上去 , 咁自然較smooth啦 , 車尾尾跨過長兼smooth ,香港咁多斜路 , 上斜你仲唔刮底 .......

依家好多線都係因為死氣喉刮底而被ban左唔行得 , 早排就終於有部換左條size細D既死氣喉試行2D , 你話係咪多餘ㄚ.......買批新車返黎換死氣喉既.....
話時話九記買呢批野都唔用下個腦既 , 買批單層代雙層 , 竟然短陣成廿部 , 長陣得10部......係咪傻架 ?

批車個Body又係失敗 , 都唔用下個腦既 , 落雨壞尾牌點算 ? , 唔通癡膠紙連膠牌 ? , 落雨D膠紙都甩唒啦.....
車頭右邊個單丁位係冇活動扶手既V櫈 , 架車轉右條友訓覺仲唔飛出去.....

原帖由 aa2_dart 於 2009-8-8 12:20 發表
總言之 , 九記今鋪搵人笨又搵自己笨.... K230 Original design係架12M長既full size單層 , 縮短去10.6M咪盞尾跨過長.....
好啦 , K230副偈係打直 , 車尾好難似Pointer個design斜上去 , 咁自然較smooth啦 , 車尾尾跨過長兼smooth ,香港咁多斜路 , 上斜你仲唔刮底 .......; Y) [+ o3 a( k# a7 s
hkitalk.net$ _3 w3 n. h. q/ ^+ X; [
依家好多線都係因為死氣喉刮底而被ban左唔行得 , 早排就終於有部換左條size細D既死氣喉試行2D , 你話係咪多餘ㄚ.......買批新車返黎換死氣喉既.....
話時話九記買呢批野都唔用下個腦既 , 買批單層代雙層 , 竟然短陣成廿部 , 長陣得10部......係咪傻架 ?

咪就係...263M架ASB繁時都唔多夠用
搞到俾人port...
好彩佢仲有訂B7RLE
如果唔係,ASC真係唔夠用...

離題一問: k series係唔係L series既伸延, 我見到佢地都係有相似既個高山位

原帖由 S3N92 於 2009-8-8 02:42 發表

好似話加訂
小弟唔鐘意富豪...不過都期待緊批MCV B7

To be fair, while the B7RLE sits high at the back, it is not as ridiculous as the K230UB, and it is a better vehicle as well in my opinion. Considering KMB is moving towords heavier, more robust vehicle (another reason why the E200Dart got snubbed).

I haven't been on the ASB yet obviously but having been on the type in Britain quite a number of times, I can only say the seats at the back was horrendous, and they sounds like a minibus as well unless it is being thrashed. It doesn't feel like a full-size bus, and I don't really like them at all.

最近我搭過幾次K230, 由樓下既7M到長途既74A都有
批車既乘坐感其實OK既, 但都唔係話十分好 (我唔明點解咁多人話K230UB避震好, 我覺得雖然唔算差, 但同VOLVO有好大距離 )
呢款車內外設計都差, 但行74A一類唔多客既線, 而且ASC既design好過ASB, 至少低地台座位多D, 我覺得問題唔大

不過好似2C,7M,77K呢類老人線, 用金雞仔真係差少少
ASB得7個低地台座位(有無記錯?), 其他位全部都要大大級咁上
Dart, B6既低地台座位好似都超過10個, 就算上山都只係細細級咁上, 明顯係較佳既設計
K230UB既design仲差過向來為人垢病既ASV樓下, 同新巴新到既11.3米鐵甲
更嚴重既情況當然係ASB得28個位, 隨時無位坐

仲有樣野我覺得有問題既係, ASB同ASC既法定載客人數 (其實都講過好多次, 但我真係覺得好有問題)
德仔,B6平坦既地台, 要企30幾人已經好難
ASB/ASC咁既design有乜可能企40/45人

e200好好多=.=

原帖由 HV7025 於 2009-8-8 15:21 發表
最近我搭過幾次K230, 由樓下既7M到長途既74A都有
批車既乘坐感其實OK既, 但都唔係話十分好 (我唔明點解咁多人話K230UB避震好, 我覺得雖然唔算差, 但同VOLVO有好大距離 )
呢款車內外設計都差, 但行74A一類唔多客既 ...

講個人感覺, 我完全唔覺得ASB避震好, 搭佢行30鄧到阿媽都唔認得, 新車黎講佢既避震算係差

同埋講企位, 我都質疑佢點企40人, 唔知佢既企位係咪計埋上山頂果d級
不過現實環境下, 邊有人會企到咁高??