舂坎角新巴失事 二十多人受傷 數人傷勢嚴重 (Updated)

原帖由 Leyland 於 2007-5-10 20:30 發表
NWFB終於決定湯咗2076

閣下可不可以說如何得知此消息?

Thx.

原帖由 Leyland 於 2007-5-10 20:30 發表
NWFB終於決定湯咗2076

唔係話拖返廠整咩???

原帖由 Leyland 於 10-5-2007 08:30 PM 發表
NWFB終於決定湯咗2076

請問閣下何時從那處得知該巴士會退役呢？

原帖由 Leyland 於 2007-5-10 20:30 發表

NWFB終於決定湯咗2076

我想問0下你呢個消息0既來源，唔該。

原帖由 nwfb1601 於 2007-5-11 20:05 發表

我想問0下你呢個消息0既來源，唔該。

He always make false statements (for example ASU1 will be a schedule bus of 43C), just ignore him, ugh.

原帖由 ATE24 於 2007-5-11 20:11 發表
He always make false statements (for example ASU1 will be a schedule bus of 43C), just ignore him, ugh.

有前科既, 而家又冇理據, 板主大人, 係時候做野了!

原帖由 Leyland 於 2007-5-10 20:30 發表
NWFB終於決定湯咗2076

從 TD 之紀錄, 數月後便知龍與鳳!

原帖由 Leyland 於 2007-5-10 20:30 發表
NWFB終於決定湯咗2076

請板友盡快於三日內或下次登入時解釋資料來源(以較早者為準)，
多謝合作！


B2板板主

P.S.  May I give some summary here, please?

Boardmate Leyland states the wrong statement because one states that NWFB decides that the bus numbered 2076 will be killed.  However, many others disprove that.  I think boardmate Leyland can answer this better:

"I guess that the NWFB bus numbered 2076 will be retired and killed." (*2)

This answer would be better because one cannot be sure if the statement is true or false.  Even the statement become false, other people cannot easily say that one is wrong.  Unfortunately, one states the NWFB will kill the bus numbered 2076.  There will be trouble because one cannot show that the statement is true.  Saying the statement, especially it may be wrong, which is too sure can be very dangerously.  This is why one's honor has been bankcrupt. (*10)



[ 本帖最後由 hp7629 於 2007-5-14 14:33 編輯 ]