出售地鐵十送一車票最後10張

[ref=334981]2A_DL13[/ref]  在 2005-8-11 01:19 PM 發表:



哈哈，如果要驚動地鐵公司，或許已是天大奇聞了。
一直以來，香港都沒有特別規舉/法例就網上討論區的
討論作出指引。然而我覺得如果地鐵公司「夠膽」阻止
任何網上的討論，就已經係違反了言論自由的好証明 ...

無人講過、地鐵公司都無講過要阻止任何網上的討論，你自己講，跟住係咁，好似有D唔公道。網友係話去Check一Check地鐵公司可否轉讓一張車票，而唔係叫地鐵公司去阻止..............

一個男仔覺得佢女朋友對他好好，成日送禮物給他，於是決定請她吃$300自助餐。
這個女仔決定將這權$100賣給她的朋友，這男仔無損失呀，個女仔都無呀，佢朋友都謙了，但呢個係咪男仔的原意？呢個女仔有無權咁做？#;)

有D網友成日自己話得就話係得，點解唔正正經經去發票公司問一問？定係都係覺得行出街自己話得就得？

[ Last edited by Wattyung on 2005-8-11 at 13:57 ]

[ref=334981]2A_DL13[/ref]  在 2005-8-11 01:19 PM 發表:
哈哈，如果要驚動地鐵公司，或許已是天大奇聞了。
一直以來，香港都沒有特別規舉/法例就網上討論區的
討論作出指引。然而我覺得如果地鐵公司「夠膽」阻止
任何網上的討論，就已經係違反了言論自由的好証明。

我一向對於規條鮮有研究(其實係無時間研究)，所以
不加評論。然而，如果是項討論有違版規，自可大條
道理終止討論及作出處罰。可是，我認為如沒有違反
站規下，地鐵公司無權終止討論，如地鐵真的要終止
討論，只會顯得地鐵的小家，亦不是現今一般大公司/
集團的作風。

另我唔知實情如何：但如果不能張貼圖利的文章，
那喜不是所有物品都要蝕讓？那倒不如把此版關閉
好了？

連人地拗緊乜都唔知，點解唔睇清楚全部回文至出聲？面就係人地俾，
架就係自己丟既。

仲有，乜呢個版淨係俾人圖利咩？一唔俾人圖利就要關站？不如再誇d
添啦好唔好？  :mad:

Since I am investigating whether the act of VA63 has violated any rules of MTR, this thread will be locked until the investigation is finished.

D1 Boardmaster

本人已於早前向地鐵公司作書面查詢，
但由於該公司未能即時回覆，因此本人
唯有繼續把此文章上鎖，以便調查。

如有不便之處，敬請原諒。

D1 板板主
da54

----

28/8 更新：
由於地鐵公司仍未回覆，因此文章會
繼續鎖上，以便調查。在此感謝各位
的忍耐及體諒！

D1 板板主
da54

----

13/9 更新：
本人已收到地鐵公司回覆。我將在分析地鐵回覆後盡快作出裁決。
不便之處，敬請原諒。

D1 板板主
da54

[ Last edited by da54 on 2005-9-13 at 22:45 ]

本人早前參考了 Gakei 兄的建議，向地鐵公司查詢有關車票售賣的事宜。
地鐵公司作出的回覆如下：

Thank you for your letter dated 11 August 2005.

“Ticket” as defined in clause 1.2 of the Conditions of Issue of Tickets includes any ticket, card (including Octopus), device, apparatus, pass or permit in whatever form issued by the Corporation from time to time for travel on the MTR which forms a part of the automatic fare collection system of the Corporation for a passenger to gain access to or exit from the paid area of the station.  In accordance with clause 1.11, all tickets, other than any Octopus, Tourist Souvenir Ticket, Special Souvenir Ticket, Souvenir Ticket by Contract or tickets for use on the AEL, or unless otherwise stated in the conditions for their use, are the property of the Corporation, and unless otherwise authorized must be delivered up to the Corporation at the end or sooner termination of a journey.

In view of the foregoing provisions, a Single Journey Ticket redeemed by a passenger under the “Ride 10 Get One Free” fare concession scheme (“the Scheme”) should be and remain to be the property of the Corporation.  Under the Conditions of Issue of Tickets, a passenger has only been granted the right to hold the ticket for travel on the MTR, and has not been authorized to sell or offer the tickets for sale or otherwise deal with the ticket in a manner inconsistent with the purpose for which the ticket is to be held.

As all tickets issued by the Corporation are subject to the Conditions of Issue of Tickets, passengers are advised to comply with the Conditions for the appropriate usage of the tickets.

Moreover, the aim of the “Ride 10 Get One Free” was to help relieve passengers’ burden, especially those who travelled on MTR on a daily basis.  Given that the Scheme was a form of concession and a practical way to offer value to our regular passengers, passengers ought not to trade in the Single Journey Tickets redeemed under the Scheme, which would deviate from the object of the Scheme.

We take this opportunity to thank you for drawing this matter to our attention and your support to MTR.

基於地鐵公司採用的解釋，加上地鐵對其車票發出條件有解釋權，
因此本人決定採納地鐵的解釋標準，亦即表示網上售賣地鐵非
紀念車票乃違反車票發出條件，亦即同時違反 iRule 第 23 條。

鑑於今次事件乃首次發生，加上本人早前亦曾作出無罪的裁決，
為對當時人公平起見，本人決定不就此作任何處分，但就希望
各位不要在本站售賣任何非紀念車票。

另外由於本文內容並不恰當，此文將繼續鎖上。本文會置頂一星期
至 26/9/2005。

對於本人要修改對今次事件的裁決，小弟深感抱歉！希望各位諒解，
並多謝各位的忍耐。

D1 板板主
da54
19/9/2005

[ Last edited by da54 on 2005-9-20 at 21:27 ]