[新聞角度]翠竹"雙層"橫行霸道？+大結局<多圖>

原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 11:44 發表

I want to point out something , as checked by this morning

At the junctions of Chuk Yuen Road / Wing Chuk Street , already quote there's not allowed ANY CAR OVER 10M to the captioned road

If he l ...

I am not really familiar with the traffic signs. Is this sign just for trucks or also other vehicles?

原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 11:29 發表


其實我一路都有個疑問
睇返相關文章，有提及過架車當時係有乘客
會唔會係當時司機一路跟原路行，去到富美街個路口陣發覺轉唔到入富美街
於是由其他乘客教路，但乘客就教錯左入翠竹...
講真，個司機有機會係未去過竹園一帶 ...

其 實 個 司 機 應 該 醒 " 爬 " 將 架 車 行 慢 D 諗 下 點 行 ,
竹 園 道 有 支 路 落 番 去 龍 翔 道 又 無 去 到 .
近 天 宏 苑 個 度 有 避 車 處 (打 上 台 問 路 最 好) 又 唔 用 ,
去 到 馬 仔 坑 道 口 又 無 轉 右 落 去 .
唔 知 之 後 有 無 打 上 台 求 救 , 淨 係 靠 個 乘 客 點 去 翠 竹 掉 頭 ?
真 係 唔 知 點 講 ? 唔 知 個 司 機 係 新 仔 定 渣 開 .
渣 開 既 就 真 係 抵 打 " 羅 友 " .

This road is not 暗斜 as it's very easy to check out


I still remember every time I need to go back my home after payment for the carpark rental I have to take extra care on this exit to avoid "long" could be for this 5 years in total till now

原帖由 da54 於 2010-3-8 11:44 發表

得星島有講...

節錄重點如下：
- 車長疑不知聯合道轉入竹園道因工程改道，繼續行駛原來路線
- 因路面暗斜影響，左後輪離地，全車動彈不得
- 車長事後聯絡控制中心，新巴派員前來安排乘客改乘另一輛巴士離去
- 新巴發言人表示 ...

原帖由 andrewyl 於 2010-3-8 11:50 發表


其 實 個 司 機 應 該 醒 " 爬 " 將 架 車 行 慢 D 諗 下 點 行 ,
竹 園 道 有 支 路 落 番 去 龍 翔 道 又 無 去 到 .
近 天 宏 苑 個 度 有 避 車 處 (打 上 台 問 路 最 好) 又 唔 用 ,
去 到 馬 仔 坑 道  ...

可能佢淨係想搵地方u-turn，所以無選擇落去龍翔道同馬仔坑道
不過搵到上翠竹我都有d O左...

Nope , I've checked this out very carefully this morning before any post being issue
FYI , , No.48 of signal


http://www.td.gov.hk/tc/road_safety/road_users_code/index/chapter_8_the_language_of_the_road/signs_giving_orders_/index.html


Every drivers should make sure they're not exceed unless a permit were granted and "except with permit" didn't shown on the said roads , so every car should follow including bus , so another story will have right now.



FYI , Regulations , related to picture No.132 and rule No.59 , and no exception listed the car on rules No.60


http://www.legislation.gov.hk/blis_pdf.nsf/6799165D2FEE3FA94825755E0033E532/07B2DE32B89924BE482575EE0077A6EA/$FILE/CAP_374G_c_b5.pdf

原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 11:49 發表


I am not really familiar with the traffic signs. Is this sign just for trucks or also other vehicles?

It's just a connective words instead , and we shouldn't pull another to the river as the junctions has well noticed they shouldn't enter for longer then 10m

原帖由 3357。KS8450 於 2010-3-8 11:24 發表

呢度有甚麼謊話?

No one said there's a security guard request he need to make a 180 turn as well according to the live yesterday I've been 5 hours except dinner time

Also , junctions already said over 10M is not permitted for enter this area in government control area

原帖由 cn2661_2d32 於 2010-3-8 08:16 發表
如果証明得到你地個看更點佢調頭係疏忽,
唔排除呢個係Multiple Causation, 個看更疏忽所以管理公司負部份責任在所難免.

姑勿論今次係新記個司機發雞盲亂搾部車上山.
但咁多矛頭/抽水/意見都係指向翠x方面.加埋平日 ...

原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 11:56 發表
Nope , I've checked this out very carefully this morning before any post being issue
FYI , , No.48 of signal


http://www.td.gov.hk/tc/road_safety/road_users_code/index/chapter_8_the_language_of_the_ ...

Dont worry mate I am not aiming at teasing you or what.
I am just not familiar with this and that's why I raise a query here.
Thanks for your answers anyway...

By the way, there are still exceptional cases as the ex-NWFB Darts serving Route 211 are longer than 10 metres.
(but surely this double decker is not excluded in normal cases)

原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 11:58 發表
It's just a connective words instead , and we shouldn't pull another to the river as the junctions has well noticed they shouldn't enter for longer then 10m

but you still need to explain what lies are involved in this thread: what lie is it, who tell this lie, and etc...
and I cant understand how a noun "LIE" could be used as a connect word here.

[ 本帖最後由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 12:06 編輯 ]

個人覺得，行緊竹園道都應該開始見到竹園巴總...
點解唔o係巴總求救~

---
有感而發的題外話︰

有時唔明，翠竹人成日會被「妖魔化」
作為居民團體，其實同政黨冇乜分別，都係要做「功績」出o黎俾人睇，整到個工作匯報
居民下年先再選佢o地連任嘛（當然問九巴拎修路錢係咪「功績」，就見仁見智）

小弟樓下居委會日日都o係條邨度歌功頌德，
點知原來同居委會關系密切的議員貪埋污，坐埋花廳。。。