Especially there're always said a security request he made the 180 turn , so who is ? any proven record ?
According to the live information and people I met , none of people mentioned such
Also , on the captioned area , there's a overhead camera which can clearly capture the whole bus how to come in by it's tail , all the information can be find out instead of someone always "said"
原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 12:03 發表
but you still need to explain what lies are involved in this thread: what lie is it, who tell this lie, and etc...
and I cant understand how a noun "LIE" could be used as a connect word here.
原帖由 rlcw 於 2010-3-8 12:14 發表
Especially there're always said a security request he made the 180 turn , so who is ? any proven record ?
According to the live information and people I met , none of people mentioned such
Also , on the captioned area , there's a overhead camera which can clearly capture the whole bus how to come in by it's tail , all the information can be find out instead of someone always "said"
Well, perhaps the security guard didnt say that directly, but if he didnt allow the double decker to go straight, what else can the driver do other than making a 180 turn? Reversing it directly? I think it is a common sense for driver to make 180 turn other than reversing, particularly in such a narrow road.
The board members just quote somebody who may witness the incident and make a guess here, it is logical and reasonable, even though it may not be exactly what happened. Accusing people telling lies here is too serious.
Maybe lies this word is over-react , I agreed and apologize
On the other hand , without any evidence , please help to advertise broad mate that not to say it's the security guard problem instead although we're the individual one
原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-3-8 13:12 發表
Well, perhaps the security guard didnt say that directly, but if he didnt allow the double decker to go straight, what else can the driver do other than making a 180 turn? Reversing it directly? I t ...
