以後想坐佢地行307? 唔洗靠特見啦!

原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-10-30 14:22 發表


Frankly, from the perspective of normal passengers, I dont think they can distinguish the major difference between JB8324 and JH2737. Who cares if the buses coming is using e-display or plastic disp ...

我講梗既係九巴派車既措手問題
以九巴成日話以客為本,以環保為本既作風
派窄凳車的確唔係一個舒適既旅程
宜家個問題唔係新唔新車,而係有幾大程度上可以提供一個舒適既旅程俾乘客
新唔新車唔緊要,但最起碼要以客為本,舒適度都係以客為本既範疇之一
如果咁講,KZ9314上83K都係提供一個更舒適既旅程俾乘客
既然對內都可以做到,對外又點會做唔到?(九巴咁注重形象)只係重唔重視既問題

原帖由 段飛 於 2010-10-30 15:45 發表


我講梗既係九巴派車既措手問題
以九巴成日話以客為本,以環保為本既作風
派窄凳車的確唔係一個舒適既旅程
宜家個問題唔係新唔新車,而係有幾大程度上可以提供一個舒適既旅程俾乘客
新唔新車唔緊要,但最起碼要以客為 ...

Well I need to repeat it again. I dont think the normal passengers will care whether the buses' seats are wide or narrow, as most likely they cant experience much difference between these two kinds. Even for me, I cant experience the enormous difference either. And I also cant see how it is related to the "image" of the bus company as you have mentioned. Do you mean the bus company should expel all the old buses just because of your so-called "image"? You know the term "image" is somehow vague in nature, and everyone would have different judgment on it, then how can you force others to have the same judgment with you?

原帖由 段飛 於 2010-10-30 15:45 發表


我講梗既係九巴派車既措手問題
以九巴成日話以客為本,以環保為本既作風
派窄凳車的確唔係一個舒適既旅程
宜家個問題唔係新唔新車,而係有幾大程度上可以提供一個舒適既旅程俾乘客
新唔新車唔緊要,但最起碼要以客為 ...

咁既話 70X , 277X , 278X , 279X 既膠豬一早就應該掃走晒
個人坐過 JE 1695 行 49X , 問題根本不大

點解成日都係咁- -
上架直梯又話D人無得坐, 要企,
曲金又話上白板好過......

其實307係有AVW同電豬,突然俾架膠豬係窄凳係有比較
反而如果307全膠豬無比較就無所謂,好似71K咁
呢個比較分唔分到唔需要係唔係巴士迷,乘客一樣可以比較
唔怕既可以去站頭向乘客做調查問舒適度,
不過呢個建議可唔可行由閣下自行判斷
建議唔一定實行到,有建議先係進步既開端

其實好簡單,如果680/681有朝一日換返膠豬,
唔知又有何意見/反應呢?阿Q精神當2000年?
假設係會變成事實,唔好話無可能,307宜家已係一個好例子
就算派JB8324係正字軌都無咁谷氣,
JB8324係舊過JH2737,咁又點?
闊凳,仲有假假地都係電牌車
再重申一次,做生意係識要包裝
包裝包得好好睇睇先係一間公司既重要理念

ps其實一個開放既討論區係有言論自由,請勿以偏概全

[ 本帖最後由 段飛 於 2010-10-30 16:53 編輯 ]

原帖由 teddybus 於 2010-10-30 16:11 發表


Well I need to repeat it again. I dont think the normal passengers will care whether the buses' seats are wide or narrow, as most likely they cant experience much difference between these two kinds. ...

呢樣我唔同意。

你分唔到唔等於一般乘客分唔到。
好多普通乘客連樓梯位前面幾排椅背較直唔好坐，
或者某o的車款有幾行座距較闊都會知道，
窄凳同闊凳就算對眼分唔到，一坐低 pat pat 都會分得到。

我覺得有人唔滿意九巴派膠豬行長途隧巴線係可以理解，
不過唔係新車同舊車膠牌定電牌，而事實上窄凳車的確係客觀地唔好坐。

都係果句啦，呢架嘢你慌佢會掛得耐咩…

這張相片.我第一下留意到的是

中環渡輪碼頭
CENTRAL (CENTRAL FERRY PIERS)

比中環(香港鐵路站)更爛....
使唔使講兩次CENTRAL...??

原帖由 段飛 於 2010-10-30 16:46 發表
其實307係有AVW同電豬,突然俾架膠豬係窄凳係有比較
反而如果307全膠豬無比較就無所謂,好似71K咁
呢個比較分唔分到唔需要係唔係巴士迷,乘客一樣可以比較
唔怕既可以去站頭向乘客做調查問舒適度,
不過呢個建議可唔可行 ...

I do think that some of the boardmates over-exaggerate the differences between wide seats and narrow seats. If you said that the passengers may feel like having more space in ATEs than 3ASVs, then I would agree, but if you insist that a normal passanger, without any knowledge on the equipments in buses or being told in advanced, can experience the differences between 3ASVs with wide seats and narrow seats, especially for the first time they get into 3ASVs with narrow seats running Rt 307, I really have doubt on it.

P.S. You have the right to put your viewpoint here, but it needs to be practical and sound. What's the point of raising a viewpoint which is not much likely to take place?

[ 本帖最後由 teddybus 於 2010-10-30 18:16 編輯 ]

唔係樓主講都唔知
61隻膠豬裡面
沙廠佔左43隻
屯廠佔10隻
跟住係九廠4隻
同荔廠3隻

沙廠咁多膠豬
係咪受惠於年前的上水廠改由沙田廠管理有關？