原帖由 qualcomm 於 2014-1-31 10:37 發表
796C, actually no one take this from/to Cheung Sha Wan/Shum Shui Po, better cut it to Prince Edward instead.
For others, 98C/296C support all the way.
Sorry, 796C complements 296C's service as the latter takes Tai Po Road and Sham Shui Po East, which needs at least 20 minutes walk to Lai Chi Kok Road.
Cut to Prince Edward will only send passengers to MTR.
Declaration: my wife always take 796C to/from Sham Shui Po.
Sorry, 796C complements 296C's service as the latter takes Tai Po Road and Sham Shui Po East, which needs at least 20 minutes walk to Lai Chi Kok Road.
Cut to Prince Edward will only send passengers ...
Whether your wife takes 796C or not is not a concern of shorten the route to Prince Edward.
原帖由 qualcomm 於 2014-1-31 10:37 發表
796C, actually no one take this from/to Cheung Sha Wan/Shum Shui Po, better cut it to Prince Edward instead.
For others, 98C/296C support all the way.
Like the route 971, despite there is only a few passengers travel along the route from Olympic to Hoi Lai Estate.
It is not wise to employ another NWFB regulator to serve at, say, the Olympic Bus Terminal.
This is the same case...
Even there is a suitable Terminal at Prince Edward, NWFB prefer their route 796C to stick with the So Uk Terminal with the route 970 and 970X for easier mongering purpose.
On the other hand, 296C and 98C don't reach Tiu Keng Leng and TKO South, people there need 796C
and it is also a complement of 796X from Kowloon City to TKO during peak hours
and 796C is faster than 296C from Mong Kok to Sheung Tak
