Well... To be honest... I think if the crew could stand being a crew and face the pressure and problems they have well enough... Then why not let them continue... retiring at 45 is too early... and also too late to find another job... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 wally 於 2006-4-6 19:57 發表
Well... To be honest... I think if the crew could stand being a crew and face the pressure and problems they have well enough... Then why not let them continue... retiring at 45 is too early... and ...
我都好同意,我都覺得45歲退休嫌太早,如果D Cabin crew退休之後去搵第二份工,人地都未必請喇~~
Even though想調返落去做ground staff,都要睇下航空公司有無相關空缺先可以繼續係航空公司效力,不過老實講我 0係香港CX都好少見到45歲以上既CSO,多數都係Supervisor或者係Manager on Duty,不過我斷估呢兩個position某D退休後既cabin crew都可以handle得到既~~
|
|
Cathay 888...clear to land rwy 26 Right
|
|
|
原帖由 billlmf 於 2006-4-7 03:20 發表
我都好同意,我都覺得45歲退休嫌太早,如果D Cabin crew退休之後去搵第二份工,人地都未必請喇~~
Even though想調返落去做ground staff,都要睇下航空公司有無相關空缺先可以繼續係航空公司效力,不過老實講我 ...
Well... Since many crew would leave the job before retirement age... I think its possible to get a certain amount of office work that are for crew that reach their retirement age to apply... At least a opportunity for those crew not to worry too much when they get close to the retirement age... I am sure in the whole CX, there should be somewhere that they could keep those crew from another 10-15yrs... |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 wally 於 2006-4-7 17:19 發表
Well... Since many crew would leave the job before retirement age... I think its possible to get a certain amount of office work that are for crew that reach their retirement age to apply... At least a opportunity for those crew not to worry too much when they get close to the retirement age... I am sure in the whole CX, there should be somewhere that they could keep those crew from another 10-15yrs...
呢個就好難講喇,如果本身0係做crew之前係有其它行業既experience就OK,但淨係得做cabin crew既experience就唔知喇~~
不過 0甘,我都覺得CX,KA同BA應該都要keep返呢班crew直到六十幾歲為止,但可惜呢三間做唔做得到都成謎,因為大把年青人既加入,而且仲要睇cost份上而定~~ |
|
Cathay 888...clear to land rwy 26 Right
|
|
|
老實講,如果一個職位由一位一萬蚊一個月又年輕貌美o既人去做,同埋搵個
兩萬蚊一個月又無咁年輕貌美o既人去做,當兩者o既服務水平都係差不多的話
,咁當然寧願請個平o的o架啦。
小弟不時都坐孩機出Trip,以我100%純粹個人意見,如果一班機係由一班美少
女做空姐,而另一班機係由一班阿婆做空姐,咁當然係前者開心o的啦~~ |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 PB602 於 2006-4-10 22:31 發表
老實講,如果一個職位由一位一萬蚊一個月又年輕貌美o既人去做,同埋搵個
兩萬蚊一個月又無咁年輕貌美o既人去做,當兩者o既服務水平都係差不多的話
,咁當然寧願請個平o的o架啦。
小弟不時都坐孩機出Trip,以我100%純粹個人意見,如果一班機係由一班美少
女做空姐,而另一班機係由一班阿婆做空姐,咁當然係前者開心o的啦~~
我可以講既就係,大部份到呢個年齡既空姐都係比較senior,多數都係Senior Purser同埋Inflight Service Manager(呢個以國泰黎講),0甘唔通真係叫D二十幾歲既妹妹仔去做呢兩個Senior既position咩!!無可能架嘛~~ |
|
Cathay 888...clear to land rwy 26 Right
|
|
|
唔知你地試過乘坐客,
由d阿婆做空姐未,
係加拿大air canada由90
%d阿婆做,問題黎喇,第
一服務態度差,第二人工高
,導致成本上升,由加國西岸去
東岸機標貴於返香港,
即係由溫哥華坐機去多倫多仲貴
過返香港!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
原帖由 FLYER 於 2006-4-15 11:50 發表
唔知你地試過乘坐客,
由d阿婆做空姐未,
係加拿大air canada由90
%d阿婆做,問題黎喇,第
一服務態度差,第二人工高
,導致成本上升,由加國西岸去
東岸機標貴於返香港,
即係由溫哥華坐機去多倫多仲貴
過返香港 ...
我就試過好多次,唔單止AC,仲有UA,NW個D都係有阿婆做Bar & Cabin~~
但係CX就好唔同喇,CX個咋都左呢個年齡既Crew差唔多全部都係SP同埋ISM,而且個比例都唔係好多,再加上CX將會有更多既新飛機加入國泰機隊,我諗CX都係時候去consider下呢樣野~~
仲有,SQ都revised左其退休年齡到55歲,但我都見唔到有乜野問題~~ |
|
Cathay 888...clear to land rwy 26 Right
|
|
|
yes... on my spring break in recent March:
(same day departure, same day return)
UA IND-YVR: US $ 650
UA IND-HKG: US $ 700
I just feel flying 16 hours makes me very tired, so I decided to go Vancouver.
I really don't know why air tickets to Canada is so expensive (esp. YVR)
Concerning the retirement age, I think it really depends on the body condition of the F/A instead of age.
(of coz... cost is a very important factor) |
|
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
|